Page 32 - annualreport2020
P. 32

AFRICAN DAWN ANNUAL REPORT   2020





            Independent Auditor’s Report

        To the shareholders of African Dawn Capital Limited  continued




        Key Audit Matters

        Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial
        statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated and separate financial statements
        as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In addition to the matter described in
        the Material uncertainty relating to going concern section above, we have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to
        be communicated in our report on the consolidated and separate financial statements.

         Matter                                              Audit Response
         Impairment allowance on Trade Receivables (Note 1.14 and  Our audit approach included obtaining an understanding of the
         Note 8)                                             group’s policy in relation to the expected credit loss impairment
                                                             allowance of trade receivables, and testing the application of this
         At 29 February 2020, trade receivables amounted to R21,46 million   policy.
         against which an impairment allowance of R12,72 million was
         recorded. This is disclosed in Note 8 to the consolidated and separate   We performed the following audit procedures:
         financial statements.                               •   Evaluated the appropriateness of the application of either a
                                                                 specific expected credit loss model or a simplified approach
         The group applies the accounting standard IFRS 9: Financial   to the relevant financial assets by understanding the nature
         Instruments and in doing so, calculates expected credit loss (“ECL”)   of the financial assets and comparing the application to the
         impairments for trade receivables, taking into account reasonable and   requirements of the standard;
         supportable forward-looking information.
                                                             •   Tested the IT general control environment and application control
                                                                 over the ageing of the trade receivables that will determine the
         The ECL impairment was a matter of most significance to the audit
         and therefore identified as a key audit matter, given the material   staging as per IFRS 9.
         value of trade receivables as a whole to the consolidated and separate   •   Obtained an understanding of the group’s approach for
         financial statements, the subjective nature / judgements of the   estimating ECL and whether this is in compliance with IFRS 9;
         impairment allowance calculation and the effect of the impairment   •   We assessed the appropriateness of relying on the work of the
         allowance on the risk management processes and operations of  management expert in terms of ISA620 by:
         the group.                                                    o evaluating the competence, capability and objectivity of the
                                                                          management expert and
         There are a number of significant management-determined
         judgements made on the ECL impairment allowance calculations             o Having discussions with the management expert to assess the
         including:                                                       scope of the review performed by the management expert
                                                             •   We tested the work of the management expert in accordance
         •   determining the criteria for a significant increase in credit risk;
                                                                 with ISA620 through verifying the data inputs used by the
         •   techniques used to determine the probability of default (“PDs”)         management expert in the ECL impairment model back to the
         •   and loss given default (“LGD”) and                  underlying data.
         •   forward looking assumptions.                    •   We considered management’s assessment of COVID-19 being
                                                                 a non-adjusting post reporting date event by considering the
         These judgements required models to measure the expected credit   timing of when sentiment changed to viewing it as a pandemic,
         losses on certain financial assets measured at amortised cost. The   taking into account the number of identified COVID-19
         large number of data inputs applied in these models increases the risk   cases in South Africa, local stock market changes and public
         that data used to develop assumptions and operate the model is not   announcements.
         appropriate or accurate.
                                                             •   We assessed the reasonableness of the economic factors
                                                                 considered by management’s expert applied in estimating the
         Another judgement required was Assessing the impact of COVID-19
         on the forward looking economic model as a nonadjusting post   impact of COVID-19 on forward looking information.
         reporting date event with it only becoming a pandemic post the
         reporting date. Information available up to 29 February 2020 was   We furthermore considered the adequacy of the group’s
         included in the forward looking economic model. The impact of   disclosure of trade receivables and the related impairment
         expected lower disposable income and retrenchments was included   allowance.
         into the macroeconomic variables input in the forward looking
         economic model.
         An independent expert was appointed by management to assist with
         the calculation of the IFRS 9 expected credit losses on the impairment
         allowance on trade receivables.




        30
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37